For over one hundred years, our attorneys have aggressively represented clients in cases that involved key components of our client's intellectual property portfolio.

• TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc.
• Chemcast Corp. v. Arco Industries Corp.
• Transmatic Inc., v. Gulton Industries, Inc.
• Perceptron & Ford Motor Co. v. Fori Automation
• Ortho-Kinetics, Inc. v. Invacare, Inc.
• McKeon Products Inc. v. Flents Products Co.
• Pheasant Run, Inc. v. Charter Township of Canton
• ND Industries v. Emary et. al

• Laminate Products, Inc. and PolyBond, Inc. v. Guardian Automotive, Inc., Guardian Industries, Inc., et al.
• Third Party Discovery Representation
• Magline, Inc. v. RealWheels Cover Company, Inc.
• Mallory v. Floyd Bell
• Winfield v. Gemmy
• Magline v. Wesco
• Young v. Lumenis

Our client sued to protect its federally registered trademarks. Our client also sued to protect the trade dress in the design of certain components of its hand trucks. After discovery, the attorneys held a settlement conference with the judge and reached a settlement and Consent Judgment that were favorable to our client. Subsequently, Reising attorneys successfully enforced the Consent Judgment. The defendant was represented by a well-established Philadelphia law firm and a large, well-known general practice firm from Detroit.

For more information, please e-mail Mr. Rick Hoffmann at hoffmann@reising.com, or call him at (248) 689-3500.