For over one hundred years, our attorneys have aggressively represented clients in cases that involved key components of our client's intellectual property portfolio.

• TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc.
• Chemcast Corp. v. Arco Industries Corp.
• Transmatic Inc., v. Gulton Industries, Inc.
• Perceptron & Ford Motor Co. v. Fori Automation
• Ortho-Kinetics, Inc. v. Invacare, Inc.
• McKeon Products Inc. v. Flents Products Co.
• Pheasant Run, Inc. v. Charter Township of Canton
• ND Industries v. Emary et. al

• Laminate Products, Inc. and PolyBond, Inc. v. Guardian Automotive, Inc., Guardian Industries, Inc., et al.
• Third Party Discovery Representation
• Magline, Inc. v. RealWheels Cover Company, Inc.
• Mallory v. Floyd Bell
• Winfield v. Gemmy
• Magline v. Wesco
• Young v. Lumenis

A Reising attorney successfully appealed a district court's decision adverse to his client. Dr. Young holds a patent relating to a feline declaw procedure. Certain of the patent claims were found indefinite, and therefore invalid, by the district court. The district court also found certain claims unenforceable for inequitable conduct. On appeal, The Federal Circuit found the claims not to be indefinite and also found the claims were not procured by inequitable conduct. See Young v. Lumenis, 492 F.3d 1336 (Fed. Cir. 2007) As a result of the reversal and subsequent remand of the case to the District Court, Dr. Young and Lumenis ultimately settled the action.

For more information, please e-mail Mr. Rick Hoffmann at hoffmann@reising.com, or call him at (248) 689-3500.