For over one hundred years, our attorneys have aggressively represented clients in cases that involved key components of our client's intellectual property portfolio.

• TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc.
• Chemcast Corp. v. Arco Industries Corp.
• Transmatic Inc., v. Gulton Industries, Inc.
• Perceptron & Ford Motor Co. v. Fori Automation
• Ortho-Kinetics, Inc. v. Invacare, Inc.
• McKeon Products Inc. v. Flents Products Co.
• Pheasant Run, Inc. v. Charter Township of Canton
• ND Industries v. Emary et. al

• Laminate Products, Inc. and PolyBond, Inc. v. Guardian Automotive, Inc., Guardian Industries, Inc., et al.
• Third Party Discovery Representation
• Magline, Inc. v. RealWheels Cover Company, Inc.
• Mallory v. Floyd Bell
• Winfield v. Gemmy
• Magline v. Wesco
• Young v. Lumenis

Representing Ortho-Kinetics in this patent infringement case, Reising suffered an initial setback when the trial court judge severely limited the scope of the claims covering the Ortho-Kinetics patent - to the point that the defendant's product did not seem to infringe. Yet, Reising succeeded in correcting the claim scope on appeal, and ultimately won a multi-million dollar judgment for their Client. This judgment was affirmed by the Court of Appeals.

This case shows that there is solid IP Law representation available in the Detroit market, and at rates that are lower than larger legal markets.

For more information, please e-mail Mr. Rick Hoffmann at hoffmann@reising.com, or call him at (248) 689-3500.