For over one hundred years, our attorneys have aggressively represented clients in cases that involved key components of our client's intellectual property portfolio.

• TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc.
• Chemcast Corp. v. Arco Industries Corp.
• Transmatic Inc., v. Gulton Industries, Inc.
• Perceptron & Ford Motor Co. v. Fori Automation
• Ortho-Kinetics, Inc. v. Invacare, Inc.
• McKeon Products Inc. v. Flents Products Co.
• Pheasant Run, Inc. v. Charter Township of Canton
• ND Industries v. Emary et. al

• Laminate Products, Inc. and PolyBond, Inc. v. Guardian Automotive, Inc., Guardian Industries, Inc., et al.
• Third Party Discovery Representation
• Magline, Inc. v. RealWheels Cover Company, Inc.
• Mallory v. Floyd Bell
• Winfield v. Gemmy
• Magline v. Wesco
• Young v. Lumenis

This was a trademark infringement case brought against a Reising client. The plaintiff complained that our client was unfairly trading on the plaintiff's good will in its name for a golf course. The plaintiff had a facility in Illinois that included a golf course. Our client operated a golf course in Michigan.

Reising Lawyers successfully defended our client against the plaintiff's effort to get a preliminary injunction, which would have forced

our client to immediately stop using the Pheasant Run name for its golf course. We then counseled our client to make a nominal one-time license payment to the plaintiff, which settled the case. The plaintiff permitted our client to continue using the name.

For more information, please e-mail Mr. Rick Hoffmann at hoffmann@reising.com, or call him at (248) 689-3500.