Scott Hogan contributed an Expert Analysis Chapter

Scott Hogan contributed an Expert Analysis Chapter to the 12th Edition of The International Comparative Legal Guide: Patents 2020, published by Global Legal Group Ltd. The chapter is entitled ‚ÄòThe Ascension of the Abstract Idea Exception‘ and takes the reader on a journey back in time to explore the origins of the abstract idea exception to patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. 101. The author uncovers the fact that this ¬†exception to patent eligibility predates modern U.S. patent law and may have been applied out-of-context by the U.S. Supreme Court in their law-altering Alice and Mayo opinions. The result of the U.S. Supreme Court’s meddling in patent eligibility has been a steady erosion of patent rights that has creeped its way into successful validity challenges of physical apparatuses such as digital cameras and electric vehicle charging stations. Mr. Hogan offers some insight into how the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit appears to be applying the SCOTUS-crafted rule for patent eligibility.

Share Article

Related

Blake Schmidt recently published an interesting article in IPLS Proceedings
Blake Schmidt recently published an interesting article in IPLS Proceedings published by the State Bar of Michigan.  Blake explained an important rule change proposed by...
An article written by Colin Cicotte published in IP issue of the Michigan Bar Journal
The State Bar of Michigan recently published an article written by Colin Cicotte titled “What is Eligible to be Patented?” in the IP issue of...
Scott Hogan and James Stevens Jr. collaborated to write a chapter
Scott Hogan and James Stevens Jr. collaborated to write a chapter for publication in the IAM Innovation & Invention Yearbook 2021. Their chapter, entitled “Functional...
Corey M. Beaubien authored a chapter
Corey M. Beaubien authored a chapter in The International Comparative Legal Guide to Patents 2020, 10th edition, released in the fall. Corey M. Beaubien authored...
A New Fault Line in the Modern Era of U.S. Patent Eligibility
A New Fault Line in the Modern Era of U.S. Patent Eligibility, first published as an expert chapter in the 11th edition of the ICLG...
Scott Hogan asks readers, "Can We Just Be Reasonable?"
[btx_image image_id=”1743″ link=”/” position=”center”][/btx_image] Scott Hogan contributed a chapter to The International Comparative Legal Guide to Patents 2019, 9th edition. The chapter is entitled Can...
Patent Confidential - On-Sale Bar and Secret Sales in America Invents Act Era
[btx_image image_id=”1171″ link=”/” position=”center”][/btx_image] Patent Confidential — On-Sale Bar and Secret Sales in America Invents Act Era, this article first appeared in IAM Yearbook: Building...
US design patents - no longer second chair
[btx_image image_id=”1169″ link=”/” position=”center”][/btx_image] After a lifetime of deference to utility patents, in recent years design patents in the United States are enjoying a place...
Method Claiming in the United States: The Who, What, and Where of Enforcement
[btx_image image_id=”1161″ link=”/” position=”center”][/btx_image] Method Claiming in the United States: The Who, What, and Where of Enforcement by Scott A. Hogan and Shannon K. Smith,...
"The Legal 500: Intellectual Property Country Comparative Guide"
[btx_image image_id=”1171″ link=”https://www.inhouselawyer.co.uk/practice-areas/intellectual-property/united-states-intellectual-property-2/” position=”center”][/btx_image] The United States chapter for “The Legal 500: Intellectual Property Country Comparative Guide“, by Matthew J. Schmidt and E. Colin Cicotte...